Nordic Statement in the GA debate on the use of the Veto in the UNSC with regards to DPRK
Thank you
Mr. President
I have the
honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Nordic countries – Finland,
Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and my own country, Denmark
Since it is
the first time we convene to discuss the recent use of a veto in the Security
Council following the adoption of resolution 76/262, allow me to attach a few
remarks to the significance of this debate.
The
Security Council is entrusted by the UN Charter with the responsibility to
maintain peace and security on behalf of us, the Member States represented here
in this assembly. The use of veto to prevent the Council from discharging its
duties is a matter of great concern. The debate provides an occasion for the
permanent members of the Council who have decided to use their veto-power to
explain the reasoning for doing so – not only to the Council – but also to all
UN Members states. This contributes to making the Council more transparent and
accountable.
The debate
also offers other UN Member States the chance to share our views on the matter
at hand. We encourage all UN members to make use of this opportunity. Allow me
to share the viewpoints of the Nordic countries:
From 2006
and up until 2017 the UN Security had an exemplary track record of adopting
resolutions unanimously against activities of the DPRK that posed a threat to
regional and international peace and security. In doing so, the UN Security
Council lived up to its obligations, [namely to address threats to
international peace and security].
The
Council’s unity remains of great importance for maintaining international law
and responding to such threats. The latest UN security council resolution 2397
(2017) addressing the ballistic missile test and nuclear weapons programme of
the People´s Democratic Republic of Korea states a clear commitment to: “take
action to restrict further the export to the DPRK of petroleum” if the
DPRK “conducts a further nuclear test or a launch of a ballistic
missile system capable of reaching intercontinental ranges or contributing to
the development of a ballistic missile system capable of such ranges”.
[cit. Para 28]
This
resolution explicitly expressed the Security Council’s determination to impose
specific restrictions towards the DPRK in case of further nuclear or ballistic
missile activities.
Mr.
President
Since the
beginning of this year, DPRK has conducted an unprecedented number of ballistic
missile tests, in clear violation of numerous UN Security Council resolutions.
This weekend alone saw 8 (eight) missile launches.
The Nordic
countries consider these actions a clear breach of Security Council resolutions
– including 2397(2017) – that undermine regional stability, threaten
international peace and security and could further heighten tensions. As the Director
General of the IAEA stated earlier this week, there are indications of renewed
activities in several nuclear sites in the DPRK.
Blatantly
ignoring the Security Council’s resolutions must have consequences.
With the
primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security as
enshrined in the UN Charter, the Council has a responsibility to step up and
act in a situation like the one before us. The power of the veto should not
limit the Council in fulfilling its mandate.
We therefore
strongly regret the use of the veto on this issue.
Mr.
President
The
Security Council has clearly affirmed that the sanctions imposed are not
intended to have adverse humanitarian consequences for the
civilian population of the DPRK. The draft resolution proposed to broaden the
humanitarian exemption mechanism. This would have been a timely update given
the critical humanitarian needs in the DPRK, especially after recent reports of
COVID-19 spreading throughout the country.
We call on
the DPRK to end its self-imposed blockade and allow the UN, its resident
coordinator, and other international organizations to re-enter and resume their
humanitarian work to meet the needs of the most vulnerable.
Mr. President
We will
continue to uphold the integrity and credibility of the UN Security Council’s
decisions and resolutions. We also urge the DPRK to re-engage in meaningful
dialogue with all relevant parties to build a basis for sustainable peace and
security and to take steps aimed at pursuing complete, verifiable, irreversible
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
And we take
this opportunity to urge the two permanent members of the Security Council who
vetoed the resolution to reconsider their position in this important matter.
Thank you.