Joint Nordic-Baltic statement at UNSC Arria-formula meeting on Artificial Intelligence
Check
Against Delivery
Mr
President,
I
have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the Nordic-Baltic
States, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden – and my
own country Denmark.
Let
me start by thanking the United Arab Emirates and Albania for convening
this timely meeting, following up on the first historic meeting on artificial
intelligence in the Security Council held in July.
***
AI
technologies are evolving fast, and the use of AI tools can create immense
opportunities, but can also be misused to pose great security risks.
Just
within the past year we have witnessed a dramatic increase in the accessibility
of AI, which is now used by a wide audience in their everyday lives. We already
now see how this new technology can bring about a large increase in
productivity and growth.
At
the same time, the AI-enabled spread of mis- and disinformation also threatens
social cohesion, trust, dialogue and peace.
AI also poses significant risks to the Security
Council’s ability to carry out its mandate. In volatile conflict situations, AI-enabled
rapid spread of disinformation and manipulated content can contribute to
further polarization and hatred among local populations. Moreover, when UN
peacekeepers are subject to disinformation campaigns, their ability to implement
their mandate is put at risk, while jeopardizing their security.
***
However, AI also holds the potential to counter these exact risks: It can improve monitoring, analysis and
foresight to enhance the UN’s ability to detect disinformation, hate speech, as
well as gender-based violence and harassment. Countering threats from AI on
public discourse, however also requires a plurality of independent and quality media.
Media literacy training and independent fact-checking organisations are
therefore useful supplements to this work.
AI tools can also improve early warning systems by forecasting potential
risks and thus contribute to mandate implementation including protection of
civilians. They can be used to analyze conflict trends and stakeholder
behaviors in order to inform UN mediation and advocacy efforts, including to
better ensure the participation of women and youth. In turn, this could enable
the Security Council’s ability to design more effective and tailor-made
peacekeeping mandates as well as informing strategic communication strategies.
***
As the development of AI technology is fast evolving, the Security
Council must engage with a broad group of stakeholders to keep updated about
emerging opportunities and risks posed by new technologies, including by continuously
inviting relevant experts from the private sector, civil society and academia
to brief the council.
Social media platforms should also be held accountable for their actions,
such as their content moderation efforts, in order to ensure robust algorithms
that are trained on diverse and inclusive data sets. What we need
is a strong global governance framework for AI that is coherent, human-centric,
transparent and accountable, ensuring respect for human rights, democracy and
the rule of law. The Global Digital Compact will constitute an important
opportunity in this regard.
EU’s new AI
Act can serve as inspiration in these efforts. We look forward to the
recommendation from the High Level Advisory Body on AI in this regard.
Thank you.